🔴 Asylum Delivery Ban ‘Almost Certain’ to Trigger Unrest

Up until very recently most people pretended not to notice. The food got delivered. The apps kept pinging. The public didn’t care. And the government, who were about as alert as a pigeon in a hammock, simply looked the other way.

After all, why fix a system that delivers kebabs hot, keeps young men off the streets, and quietly defuses the social time-bomb they themselves created?

But now It’s official. The gig economy’s worst-kept secret has exploded into the limelight like a Deliveroo bag full of fireworks left too close to a kebab grill. As unfortunately, as with all great British traditions, someone filmed it. And now, we’re in the death spiral.

Videos surfaced. Headlines exploded. Shadow ministers ominously pointed at e-bikes. The Home Office took a very deep breath, arranged a roundtable, and deployed their most dangerous weapon: a strongly worded announcement. The delivery companies panicked and promised facial recognition, daily scans, and algorithmic wizardry, none of which will work, but all of which at least sounds excellent in committee.

So, to bring the any of our readers not in the know now put to speed, for some years now behind the scenes, tens of thousands of asylum seekers — you know, the ones placed in hotels at taxpayer expense — have been quietly working as riders for Uber Eats, Deliveroo and Just Eat. And the trick to this is oh so, simple enough.

You can’t open an account if you’ve got no right to work in the UK, but you can rent someone else’s account for around sixty quid a week via any one of several thriving Facebook groups. It’s the digital equivalent of borrowing someone’s ID to get into a nightclub, except the nightclub is the roads of London, and the doorman is a facial recognition app that gets checked roughly once per leap year.

But, this isn’t a fringe activity. One Facebook group we found, alone had over 30,000 members, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

In Greater London alone there are more than 15,000 asylum seekers living in hotels — not exactly hiding in the shadows, as evidenced by all the frankly comical video footage of branded delivery bikes lined up like a corporate parade outside three-star taxpayer-funded hotels.

It’s hard to feel inconspicuous when your job involves wearing a Just Eat jacket brighter than a nuclear warning sign and riding a converted e-bike that sounds like a wasp stuck in a hoover.

Of course, these aren’t really e-bikes at all. They’re technically illegal mopeds — unregistered, uninsured, and often souped up to a speed that makes legal cyclists look like they’re travelling through treacle. Naturally, this combination of high-speed machinery and zero licensing is precisely what every city needs in its pedestrian zones, and nothing says “compliance” like a fleet of untraceable bikes operated by people who technically don’t exist in the workforce.

The food delivery companies have long had clauses that allow “substitution” — meaning your mate can take your shift. What they didn’t account for was your mate being an undocumented Eritrean national with no driving licence, no insurance, and no clue where Ealing is. But as long as the app gets pinged and the chips get delivered, the platforms looked the other way. For years. Possibly with both eyes shut and one hand over the lens.

Enter the Home Office — not so much galloping in as arriving breathless and red-faced with a new press strategy. Last week, they unveiled a “nationwide blitz” on illegal delivery riders. Hotels raided. Phones seized. E-bikes confiscated. Ministers looking terribly stern outside buildings. Even Chris Philp got involved, filming himself outside a hotel and pointing at the branded bikes like a crime scene investigator who’s just spotted a kebab.

The delivery firms, in full PR damage-control mode, were summoned to Whitehall like naughty schoolboys who’d been caught sneaking fags behind the bike sheds. They have now “voluntarily” agreed to do more identity verification. Just Eat, for instance, will be upgrading from monthly checks to daily ones — which is a bit like saying you’ll start checking if your car still has wheels more than once a year.

But here’s the rub: none of it solves the problem.

Because you can bolt on as much biometric surveillance as you like. If you still allow account rental — and they do — all you’ve built is a more expensive workaround. But the real and only fix isn’t technological. It’s legislative. The clause must and will go, we now have information that this is already being planned. And now whether by political pressure, press backlash or sheer panic, it will.

When it does, the consequences will arrive faster than a moped on a red light.

Because once account sharing is banned outright — as it now inevitably must and will be — every single asylum seeker currently earning via Uber Eats, Deliveroo, or Just Eat will be unplugged overnight. No backdoor. No workaround. No cash. Just a government-issue tenner a week and a hotel room with a dodgy telly and a free kettle you can’t steal.

The real effect? Immediate and devastating. This move will instantly sever the only financial lifeline used by tens of thousands of young men across the UK — men who are already in limbo, barred from working, stranded in hotel rooms with £10 a week to live on, no structured activity, no transport, no women, and not a hope in hell of accessing normal adult life.

Most speak little English. Most have no meaningful access to education, training, or integration services. Many — rightly or wrongly — assumed they’d be able to work informally until their status was sorted. Instead, they’re now facing an enforced return to absolute zero.

And this is where the real story begins.

Yes, we are really talking about £10.00. A week. For an adult man. In London. In 2025. Which, if you’re wondering, gets you either a lukewarm Greggs pasty or a days discounted discounted travel on the TFL network.

But let’s not be naïve. The consequences aren’t just financial. They’re socially catastrophic.

To be totally honest in reality, these young men don’t want community choirs and trauma-informed yoga. They’re not sitting in their hotel rooms longing for a well-structured language course or a diversity-positive employability mentor named Claire. They want two things. Money. And women. Not necessarily in that order.

And now they’re getting neither.

No job. No income. No nights out. No prospects. And absolutely no chance of meeting a girlfriend when your idea of a romantic evening is splitting a pack of own-brand crisps from the corner shop you walked to because the bus fare eats half your week’s allowance.

This isn’t about culture. It’s not about integration. It’s about total emasculation. What’s being created here — by policy, not accident — is a subclass of bored, broke, unwanted men, with nothing to do, nothing to spend, and no meaningful way of participating in adult society.

They are not going to take up pottery. They are not going to become amateur beekeepers. They are not going to spend six months on a waitlist for a charity-funded cycle repair workshop that teaches them to find their inner sense of purpose. What they will do, when this loophole closes, is simple: whatever it takes.

Some will vanish into even darker corners of the black economy. Some will find gangs who do pay, no paperwork required. Some will rob. Some will lash out. Some will snap. And all of them will know that nobody ever intended to help them — only to shut them down quietly.

This isn’t fear mongering. It’s arithmetic. You take away purpose. You take away income. You take away sex, status, and forward motion. What you’re left with is a pressure cooker the size of Zone 2, and nobody on Whitehall has the faintest idea how to defuse it — because they built it.

Of course, they’ll announce it with fanfare. A new law. A clampdown. A crackdown on app abuse. The platforms will release press releases about “rider trust protocols” and “compliance culture”. And for a week or two, the press will pat itself on the back and declare the problem solved.

Then the police logs will start filling up. Then the court lists. Then the prisons.

All because a system that actually worked — if only just — has now become a politically inconvenient reality. And the men who used it to survive, quietly, invisibly, will soon be back in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.

So yes. The clause will go. The job will vanish. The social fabric will tear. And when it does, everyone will look shocked. And you’ll know exactly why. Because you read it here on Video Production News first.

Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.